Publikation

A Pooled Analysis of Sequential Therapies with Sorafenib and Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 02.06.2012

Bereiche
PubMed
DOI

Zitation
Stenner F, Renner C, Porta C, Buchler T, Knuth A, Stoll S, Siciliano R, Rothermundt C, Cathomas R, Haile S, Liewen H, Chastonay R, Samaras P. A Pooled Analysis of Sequential Therapies with Sorafenib and Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncology 2012; 82:333-340.
Art
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review (Englisch)
Zeitschrift
Oncology 2012; 82
Veröffentlichungsdatum
02.06.2012
eISSN (Online)
1423-0232
Seiten
333-340
Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung

Objective: To evaluate the optimal sequence for the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (rTKIs) sorafenib and sunitinib in metastatic renal cell cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had received sequential therapy with both rTKIs and integrated these results into a pooled analysis of available data from other publications. Differences in median progression-free survival (PFS) for first- (PFS1) and second-line treatment (PFS2), and for the combined PFS (PFS1 plus PFS2) were examined using weighted linear regression. Results: In the pooled analysis encompassing 853 patients, the median combined PFS for first-line sunitinib and 2nd-line sorafenib (SuSo) was 12.1 months compared with 15.4 months for the reverse sequence (SoSu; 95% CI for difference 1.45-5.12, p = 0.0013). Regarding first-line treatment, no significant difference in PFS1 was noted regardless of which drug was initially used (0.62 months average increase on sorafenib, 95% CI for difference -1.01 to 2.26, p = 0.43). In second-line treatment, sunitinib showed a significantly longer PFS2 than sorafenib (average increase 2.66 months, 95% CI 1.02-4.3, p = 0.003). Conclusion: The SoSu sequence translates into a longer combined PFS compared to the SuSo sequence. Predominantly the superiority of sunitinib regarding PFS2 contributed to the longer combined PFS in sequential use.