Publikation

Cognitive performance in high-altitude climbers: a comparative study of saccadic eye movements and neuropsychological tests

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review - 06.04.2013

Bereiche
PubMed
DOI

Zitation
Merz T, Turk A, Hess T, Schoch O, Bloch K, Schmitt K, Hefti U, Pichler J, Barthelmes D, Bosch M, Schwarz U. Cognitive performance in high-altitude climbers: a comparative study of saccadic eye movements and neuropsychological tests. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013; 113:2025-37.
Art
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel/Review (Englisch)
Zeitschrift
Eur J Appl Physiol 2013; 113
Veröffentlichungsdatum
06.04.2013
eISSN (Online)
1439-6327
Seiten
2025-37
Kurzbeschreibung/Zielsetzung

Impairment of cognitive performance during and after high-altitude climbing has been described in numerous studies and has mostly been attributed to cerebral hypoxia and resulting functional and structural cerebral alterations. To investigate the hypothesis that high-altitude climbing leads to cognitive impairment, we used of neuropsychological tests and measurements of eye movement (EM) performance during different stimulus conditions. The study was conducted in 32 mountaineers participating in an expedition to Muztagh Ata (7,546 m). Neuropsychological tests comprised figural fluency, line bisection, letter and number cancellation, and a modified pegboard task. Saccadic performance was evaluated under three stimulus conditions with varying degrees of cortical involvement: visually guided pro- and anti-saccades, and visuo-visual interaction. Typical saccade parameters (latency, mean sequence, post-saccadic stability, and error rate) were computed off-line. Measurements were taken at a baseline level of 440 m and at altitudes of 4,497, 5,533, 6,265, and again at 440 m. All subjects reached 5,533 m, and 28 reached 6,265 m. The neuropsychological test results did not reveal any cognitive impairment. Complete eye movement recordings for all stimulus conditions were obtained in 24 subjects at baseline and at least two altitudes and in 10 subjects at baseline and all altitudes. Measurements of saccade performances showed no dependence on any altitude-related parameter and were well within normal limits. Our data indicates that acclimatized climbers do not seem to suffer from significant cognitive deficits during or after climbs to altitudes above 7,500 m. We demonstrated that investigation of EMs is feasible during high-altitude expeditions.