European Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Development Scheme: An Overview of Evidence Quality Assessment Methods, Evidence to Decision Frameworks, and Reporting Standards in Guideline Development
George A Antoniou, Frederico Bastos Gonçalves, Martin Björck, Nabil Chakfé, Raphaël Coscas, Nuno V Dias, Florian Dick, Stavros K Kakkos, Barend M E Mees, Timothy Resch, Santi Trimarchi, Riikka Tulamo, Chris P Twine, Frank Vermassen, Anders Wanhainen & Philippe Kolh
abstract
|
OBJECTIVE
A structured and transparent approach is instrumental in translating
research evidence to health recommendations and evidence informed
clinical decisions. The aim was to conduct an overview and analysis
of principles and methodologies for health guideline
development.
METHODS
A literature review on methodologies, strategies, and fundamental
steps in the process of guideline development was performed. The
clinical practice guideline development process and methodology
adopted by the European Society for Vascular Surgery are also
presented.
RESULTS
Sophisticated methodologies for health guideline development are
being applied increasingly by national and international
organisations. Their overarching principle is a systematic,
structured, transparent, and iterative process that is aimed at
making well informed healthcare choices. Critical steps in guideline
development include the assessment of the certainty of the body of
evidence; evidence to decision frameworks; and guideline reporting.
The goal of strength of evidence assessments is to provide well
reasoned judgements about the guideline developers' confidence in
study findings, and several evidence hierarchy schemes and evidence
rating systems have been described for this purpose. Evidence to
decision frameworks help guideline developers and users
conceptualise and interpret the construct of the quality of the body
of evidence. The most widely used evidence to decision frameworks
are those developed by the GRADE Working Group and the
WHO-INTEGRATE, and are structured into three distinct components:
background; assessment; and conclusions. Health guideline reporting
tools are employed to ensure methodological rigour and transparency
in guideline development. Such reporting instruments include the
AGREE II and RIGHT, with the former being used for guideline
development and appraisal, as well as reporting.
CONCLUSION
This guide will help guideline developers/expert panels enhance
their methodology, and patients/clinicians/policymakers interpret
guideline recommendations and put them in context. This document may
be a useful methodological summary for health guideline development
by other societies and organisations.
|
|
|
citation
|
Antoniou G A, Bastos Gonçalves F, Björck M, Chakfé N, Coscas R,
Dias N V, Dick F, Kakkos S K, Mees B M E, Resch T, Trimarchi S,
Tulamo R, Twine C P, Vermassen F, Wanhainen A, Kolh P. European
Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Development
Scheme: An Overview of Evidence Quality Assessment Methods, Evidence
to Decision Frameworks, and Reporting Standards in Guideline
Development. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022;.
|
|
|
type
|
journal paper/review (English)
|
date of publishing
|
22-03-2022
|
journal title
|
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
|
ISSN electronic
|
1532-2165
|
PubMed
|
35697645
|
DOI
|
10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.03.014
|
additional links & downloads