Publication

Modulation of food intake by glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes

Journal Paper/Review - Dec 1, 2005

Units
PubMed

Citation
Schultes B, Peters A, Hallschmid M, Benedict C, Merl V, Oltmanns K, Born J, Fehm H, Kern W. Modulation of food intake by glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes care 2005; 28:2884-9.
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
Diabetes care 2005; 28
Publication Date
Dec 1, 2005
Issn Print
0149-5992
Pages
2884-9
Brief description/objective

OBJECTIVE: A gain in body weight is a common adverse effect of glucose-lowering therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes, the mechanisms of which are not completely understood. Blood glucose is considered to play a crucial role in the regulation of food intake. On this background, we hypothesized that a short-term reduction of blood glucose concentration to normal values acutely increases food intake in type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: To test this hypothesis, 12 patients with type 2 diabetes were examined twice, once during a euglycemic (5.0 mmol/l) clamp experiment and another time during a hyperglycemic (10.5 mmol/l) clamp. The experiments were performed in a single-blind fashion with the order of conditions balanced across patients. On both clamp conditions, insulin was infused at a constant rate of 2.5 mU/kg per min for 125 min. Simultaneously, a glucose solution was infused at a variable rate to achieve target glycemic levels. During the final 30 min of the clamps, the patients were allowed to eat as much as they liked from a standard breakfast buffet. RESULTS: Compared with the hyperglycemic condition, the patients ingested on average 25 +/- 10% more energy during euglycemia (645 +/- 75 vs. 483 +/- 37 kcal; P = 0.029). The increased energy intake during euglycemia was equally distributed across macronutrient components, i.e., during euglycemia the patients ate more carbohydrates (+27.1 +/- 11.4%; P = 0.037), fat (+22.5 +/- 10.0%; P = 0.046), and proteins (+25.2 +/- 11.2%; P = 0.046) than during hyperglycemia. Circulating levels of insulin, amylin, leptin, ghrelin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 did not differ between the euglycemic and hyperglycemia clamp, excluding a major contribution of these hormones to the difference in food intake. Summing up the glucose administered intravenously and the food ingested yielded a remarkably similar total energy influx in both conditions (794 +/- 64 vs. 790 +/- 53 kcal; P = 0.961). CONCLUSIONS: Together our data suggest that total energy supply to the organism is tightly regulated on a short-term basis independent of the route of influx. Alternatively, it can be hypothesized that euglycemia stimulated or that hyperglycemia suppressed food intake at the subsequent buffet meal in our type 2 diabetic patients. Regardless of these different interpretations, our data indicate an important regulatory role of glucose for food intake in type 2 diabetic patients that is of considerable clinical relevance.