abstract
|
Background
There is evidence that specific variants of scapular morphology are
associated with dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability.
To this date, observations regarding glenoid and/or acromial
variants were analyzed independently, with two-dimensional imaging
or without comparison with a healthy control group. Therefore, the
purpose of this study was to analyze and describe the
three-dimensional (3D) shape of the scapula in healthy and in
shoulders with static or dynamic posterior instability using 3D
surface models and 3D measurement methods.
Methods
In this study, 30 patients with unidirectional posterior instability
and 20 patients with static posterior humeral head subluxation
(static posterior instability, Walch B1) were analyzed. Both cohorts
were compared with a control group of 40 patients with stable,
centered shoulders and without any clinical symptoms. 3D surface
models were obtained through segmentation of computed tomography
images and 3D measurements were performed for glenoid (version and
inclination) and acromion (tilt, coverage, height).
Results
Overall, the scapulae of patients with dynamic and static
instability differed only marginally among themselves. Compared with
the control group, the glenoid was 2.5° ( = .032),
respectively, 5.7° ( = .001) more retroverted and 2.9°
( = .025), respectively, 3.7° ( = .014) more downward
tilted in dynamic, respectively, static instability. The acromial
roof of dynamic instability was significantly higher and on average
6.2° ( = .007) less posterior covering with an increased
posterior acromial height of +4.8mm ( = .001). The
acromial roof of static instability was on average 4.8° ( =
.041) more externally rotated (axial tilt), 7.3° ( = .004)
flatter (sagittal tilt), 8.3° ( = .001) less posterior
covered with an increased posterior acromial height of +5.8 mm
(0.001).
Conclusion
The scapula of shoulders with dynamic and static posterior
instability is characterized by an increased glenoid retroversion
and an acromion that is shorter posterolaterally, higher, and more
horizontal in the sagittal plane. All these deviations from the
normal scapula values were more pronounced in static posterior
instability.
|
citation
|
Beeler S, Leoty L, Hochreiter B, Carrillo F, Götschi T, Fischer T,
Fürnstahl P, Gerber C. Similar scapular morphology in patients with
dynamic and static posterior shoulder instability. JSES Int 2021;
5:181-189.
|