Publication

Readability assessment of online patient education materials provided by the European Association of Urology

Journal Paper/Review - Sep 13, 2017

Units
PubMed
Doi

Citation
Betschart P, Zumstein V, Bentivoglio M, Engeler D, Schmid H, Abt D. Readability assessment of online patient education materials provided by the European Association of Urology. Int Urol Nephrol 2017; 49:2111-2117.
Type
Journal Paper/Review (English)
Journal
Int Urol Nephrol 2017; 49
Publication Date
Sep 13, 2017
Issn Electronic
1573-2584
Pages
2111-2117
Brief description/objective

PURPOSE
To assess the readability of the web-based patient education material provided by the European Association of Urology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
English patient education materials (PEM) as available in May 2017 were obtained from the EAU website. Each topic was analyzed separately using six well-established readability assessment tools, including Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), SMOG Grade Level (SMOG), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch Reading Ease Formula (FRE) and Fry Readability Graph (FRG).

RESULTS
A total of 17 main topics were identified of which separate basic and in-depth information is provided for 14 topics. Calculation of grade levels (FKGL, SMOG, CLI, GFI) showed readability scores of 7th-13th grade for basic information, 8th-15th grade for in-depth information and 7th-15th grade for single PEM. Median FRE score was 54 points (range 45-65) for basic information and 56 points (41-64) for in-depth information. The FRG as a graphical assessment revealed only 13 valid results with an approximate 8th-17th grade level.

CONCLUSION
The EAU provides carefully worked out PEM for 17 urological topics. Although improved readability compared to similar analyses was found, a simplification of certain chapters might be helpful to facilitate better patient understanding.